This is an English translation. Read the Icelandic original
🧭Where do we stand?

What would we gain from membership?

Lower interest rates, stabler prices and safer pensions. Cheaper food, more competition and a seat at the table where the rules are being made anyway. And a more secure existence for a small nation in the middle of the North Atlantic.

The debate about the European Union tends to get stuck on individual items — quotas, tariffs, the króna. Here is the big picture: what we would gain from membership, in brief, with links to the detailed answers.

Our wallets

  • Lower interest rates. With the euro we would borrow at rates other Europeans take for granted. The gap between Icelandic and European mortgage rates is the single largest cost item for an ordinary family.
    What would the euro mean for my wallet?
  • Lower inflation. Inflation in the eurozone has averaged about half of ours, with far smaller swings. Goodbye to the inflation rollercoaster.
    What would the euro mean for my wallet?
  • No indexation. Indexed loans are an Icelandic peculiarity, born of the fact that the króna cannot be trusted. With a stable currency the reason for them disappears — and mortgage debt can no longer mutate overnight.
    When and how would we adopt the euro?
  • Safer pensions. Our pension funds hold enormous claims on the future — in krónur. With the euro, our savings give us direct purchasing power in the huge, stable economy of Europe and indeed the whole world.
    Are our pensions better protected with the euro?
  • More stability. A predictable exchange rate, predictable interest rates, predictable prices. Businesses can plan and households can organise their future without the króna upsetting the calculation.
    What would EU membership cost?

Trade and competition

Democracy and governance

  • More sovereignty. Today we adopt a large share of EU rules without a vote. Inside the Union we would have a seat at the table: a vote in the Council, a Commissioner, and members of the European Parliament. That is more sovereignty, not less.
    Would we lose our sovereignty?
    Would a small country have any say?
  • More professional governance. Membership comes with clear requirements on transparency, professional standards, oversight and the rule of law. Those requirements apply to us as to everyone else — and that is an advantage for the public in a small country where personal connections, cliques and arbitrary decisions have sometimes counted for more than competence.
    Do we have to adapt to the EU before we join?

Solidarity and security

  • Solidarity with a continent of democracy, culture and human rights. We share values, history and culture with Europe. Membership is a statement of where we want to stand in a world where great powers show small nations ever less consideration.
    Isn't it just the "commissars in Brussels" who run the EU?
  • A more secure existence for a small nation in the middle of the North Atlantic. With membership, 27 states commit to coming to our aid if we are threatened, whether by force or by economic coercion. The European Union has stood firmly behind Denmark on Greenland — which gives pause for thought about what can await small nations that stand alone.
    Would the EU make us safer?

What does it cost?

Membership is certainly not free. Direct membership contributions would be higher than our EEA payments today, we would need to negotiate on fisheries and agriculture, and the euro would not arrive on day one. These topics have their own place on this site — see What would EU membership cost?, What about our marine resources? and When would we adopt the euro?.

In short: Membership is not about one item but about the whole picture: a cheaper and more predictable daily life, a voice in decisions that affect us anyway, and an alliance that stands with us when it matters. Every item above has a fuller answer; click, read and make up your own mind.


Sources and further reading: